Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jcgo.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 2, June 2026, pages 62-68


Does Office Hysteroscopy Add Value in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients With Normal Transvaginal Ultrasound Findings?

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Chromohysteroscopy: Methylene blue staining of pathologic endometrium.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Hysteroscopic appearance of micropolyps at Darwish triad.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Hysteroscopic appearance of congested endometrium and micropolyps.
Figure 3.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Demographic Data in Both Groups
 
Group A (n = 100)Group B (n = 50)P value
BMI: body mass index; SD: standard deviation.
Age (years), mean ± SD28.94 ± 4.6226.86 ± 3.710.224
Weight (kg), mean ± SD73.33 ± 11.6667.36 ± 12.50< 0.005
Height (cm), mean ± SD158.17 ± 28.5161.30 ± 6.980.447
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD27.51 ± 3.5325.80 ± 4.03< 0.008
Education
  Illiterate41 (41.0%)23 (46.0%)
  Primary school23 (23.0%)14 (28.0%)0.665
  Secondary school27 (27.0%)11 (22.0%)
  High level9 (9.0%)2 (4.0%)
Infertility
  Primary72 (72.0%)33 (66.0%)0.284
  Secondary28 (28.0%)17 (34.0%)
Medication
  No87 (87.0%)50 (100%)
  Metformin 850 mg XR (sustained release)5 (5.0%)0< 0.01
  Metformin 500 mg5 (5.0%)0
  Clomiphene citrate3 (3.0%)0
Parity
  072 (72.0%)33 (66.0%)
  115 (15.0%)13 (26.0%)0.434
  211 (11.0%)3 (6.0%)
  32 (2.0%)1 (2.0%)
Duration of infertility, mean ± SD4.87 ± 2.394.25 ± 2.430.139

 

↓  Table 2. Hormonal Profile in Study Groups
 
Group A (n = 100)Group B (n = 50)P value
TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; SD: standard deviation.
TSH, mean ± SD2.88 ± 1.562.75 ± 1.10.621
Prolactin, mean ± SD13.19 ± 6.1112.25 ± 6.310.388
LH, mean ± SD8.85 ± 3.0154.94 ± 2.29< 0.000
FSH, mean ± SD7.34 ± 3.355.82 ± 2.24< 0.001

 

↓  Table 3. Hysteroscopic Findings in Study Groups
 
Group A (n = 100)Group B (n = 50)P value
Cervical canal
  Normal91 (91.0%)47 (94.0%)0.495
  Thick mucosal secretion6 (6.0%)3 (6.0%)
  Ectopy (ectocervix)3 (3.0%)0
Endometrium
  Normal94 (94.0%)46 (92.0%)
  Thin4 (4.0%)4 (8.0%)0.569
Focal lesions
  Micropolyps1 (1.0%)0
Morphological anomalies
  Subseptate uterus1 (1.0%)0
Endometrial vasculature
  Normal89 (89.0%)42 (84.0%)
  Pale7 (7.0%)7 (14.0%)0.325
  Congested4 (4.0%)1 (2.0%)
Darwish triad
  Normal94 (94%)76 (92%)0.325
  Intratubal micropolyps6 (6%)4 (8%)

 

↓  Table 4. Histopathologic Findings in Both Groups
 
Group A (n = 100)Group B (n = 50)P value
Proliferative endometrium76 (76.0%)42 (84.0%)
Chronic endometritis7 (14%)4 (8%)
Distorted proliferative endometrium8 (16%)00.239
Microscopic polypi7 (7.0%)4 (8.0%)
Simple hyperplasia2 (2%)0

 

↓  Table 5. Diagnostic Indices of Office Hysteroscopy Versus Histopathology in Both Groups
 
Group A (n = 100)Group B (n = 50)
PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.
Sensitivity100%93.50%
Specificity100%100%
PPV94%91.48%
NPP06.50%