Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jcgo.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 1, March 2026, pages 24-29


The Relationship Between Branched-Chain Amino Acid Levels and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Low-Risk Pregnant Women

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The ROC curve of postprandial valine, fasting leucine, postprandial leucine, fasting isoleucine, and postprandial isoleucine values for gestational diabetes mellitus. ROC: receiver operating characteristic.

Tables

Table 1. Comparison of the Sociodemographic Characteristics Between Groups
 
GDM, n (%)Control, n (%)Pa
aChi-square analysis was applied. GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.
Education level0.323
  Primary school7 (12.7)2 (3.6)
  Middle school2 (3.6)4 (7.3)
  High school26 (47.3)26 (47.3)
  University20 (36.4)23 (41.8)
Profession0.158
  Works15 (27.3)22 (40.0)
  Housewife40 (72.7)33 (60.0)
Surgical history0.140
  Yes9 (16.4)4 (7.3)
  No46 (83.6)51 (92.7)
Smoker0.541
  Yes5 (9.1)7 (12.7)
  No50 (90.9)48 (87.3)
Pregnancy week0.614
  245 (9.1)8 (14.5)
  2515 (27.3)18 (32.7)
  2610 (18.2)12 (21.8)
  2716 (29.1)11 (20.0)
  289 (16.4)6 (10.9)

 

Table 2. Comparison of the Anthropometric Characteristics Between Groups
 
GDM, medianControl, medianP
aStudent’s t-test was applied. bMann-Whitney U test was applied. BMI: body mass index; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.
Age28.3 ± 4.327.6 ± 5.30.494a
Pre-pregnancy weight60.2 ± 9.661.2 ± 10.50.601a
Weight during test68.0 ± 8.667.7 ± 8.70.838a
Height161.6 ± 5.9162.5 ± 5.20.745b
BMI26.0 ± 2.625.6 ± 2.80.568b

 

Table 3. Comparison of Fasting and Postprandial Amino Acid Values Between Groups
 
GDM, median (µmol/L)Control, median (µmol/L)P
aStudent’s t-test was applied. bMann-Whitney U test was applied. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, indicating that the observed differences were unlikely to have occurred by chance. GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.
Fasting valine154.6 ± 28.7154.7 ± 32.30.990a
Postprandial valine168.5 ± 46.8138.5 ± 35.90.001b
Fasting leucine82.9 ± 16.167.4 ± 18.7< 0.001a
Postprandial leucine95.3 ± 34.257.7 ± 21.4< 0.001b
Fasting isoleucine44.5 ± 9.737.7 ± 13.60.003a
Postprandial isoleucine51.8 ± 19.234.6 ± 28.0< 0.001b

 

Table 4. Specificity and Sensitivity of Amino Acids in Determining the Diagnosis of GDM
 
AreaP95% CISensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, indicating that the observed differences were unlikely to have occurred by chance. CI: confidence interval; GA: glycine alanine; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; NPV: negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value.
Fasting valine ≤ 117.540.5030.9620.406–0.5995.583.62546.9
Postprandial valine > 138.640.691< 0.0010.596–0.77676.458.264.671.1
Fasting leucine > 61.180.743< 0.0010.651–0.82194.552.766.790.6
Postprandial leucine > 74.910.836< 0.0010.753–0.89974.58078.875.9
Fasting isoleucine > 36.320.6820.0010.587–0.76887.358.267.682.1
Postprandial isoleucine > 37.950.799< 0.0010.712–0.8708069.172.177.6