Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jcgo.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 1, March 2026, pages 19-23


Are Transobturator Slings as Durable as Retropubic Slings?

Tables

↓  Table 1. Patient Characteristics
 
Numbers are mean ± SD or n (%). SD: standard deviation; SUI: stress urinary incontinence.
Age at surgery (mean ± SD) 57.1 ± 12.7
Race
  Black or African American 7 (2.4)
  Asian 10 (3.3)
  White 267 (90.5)
  Other/patient declined 11 (3.7)
Ethnic group
  Non-Hispanic 254 (86.1)
  Hispanic 36 (12.2)
  Patient declined 5 (1.7)
Body mass index (mean ± SD) 25.6 ± 5.4
Number of prior vaginal deliveries 2 ± 1.5
Presence of mixed urinary incontinence 44 (14.9)
Menopausal status
  Pre/peri-menopausal 90 (30.5)
  Post-menopausal 169 (57.3)
  Unknown 36 (12.2)
Prior procedure for SUI (n = 13)
  Bulking agent 2 (0.7)
  Mesh sling 8 (2.7)
  Fascia lata sling 3 (1.0)
Concurrent procedures
  Hysterectomy 31 (10.5)
  Uterine prolapse repair 68 (23.1)
  Vaginal repair 115 (39.0)

 

↓  Table 2. Outcomes by Length of Follow-Up
 
All follow-up lengths (n = 295) Follow-up > 1 year (n = 219) Follow-up > 3 years (n = 181) Follow-up > 5 years (n = 161) Follow-up > 10 years (n = 56)
Numbers are n (%). SUI: stress urinary incontinence.
No SUI per patient 245 (83.1) 173 (79.0) 142 (78.5) 124 (77.0) 43 (76.8)
Mild SUI per patient but not bothersome 23 (7.8) 20 (9.1) 16 (8.8) 15 (9.3) 4 (7.1)
Reoperation 20 (6.7) 19 (8.7) 17 (9.4) 16 (9.9) 6 (10.7)
Recurrence but no reoperation 7 (2.4) 7 (3.2) 6 (3.3) 6 (3.7) 3 (5.4)