Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jcgo.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 1, March 2026, pages 19-23


Are Transobturator Slings as Durable as Retropubic Slings?

Tables

Table 1. Patient Characteristics
 
Numbers are mean ± SD or n (%). SD: standard deviation; SUI: stress urinary incontinence.
Age at surgery (mean ± SD)57.1 ± 12.7
Race
  Black or African American7 (2.4)
  Asian10 (3.3)
  White267 (90.5)
  Other/patient declined11 (3.7)
Ethnic group
  Non-Hispanic254 (86.1)
  Hispanic36 (12.2)
  Patient declined5 (1.7)
Body mass index (mean ± SD)25.6 ± 5.4
Number of prior vaginal deliveries2 ± 1.5
Presence of mixed urinary incontinence44 (14.9)
Menopausal status
  Pre/peri-menopausal90 (30.5)
  Post-menopausal169 (57.3)
  Unknown36 (12.2)
Prior procedure for SUI (n = 13)
  Bulking agent2 (0.7)
  Mesh sling8 (2.7)
  Fascia lata sling3 (1.0)
Concurrent procedures
  Hysterectomy31 (10.5)
  Uterine prolapse repair68 (23.1)
  Vaginal repair115 (39.0)

 

Table 2. Outcomes by Length of Follow-Up
 
All follow-up lengths (n = 295)Follow-up > 1 year (n = 219)Follow-up > 3 years (n = 181)Follow-up > 5 years (n = 161)Follow-up > 10 years (n = 56)
Numbers are n (%). SUI: stress urinary incontinence.
No SUI per patient245 (83.1)173 (79.0)142 (78.5)124 (77.0)43 (76.8)
Mild SUI per patient but not bothersome23 (7.8)20 (9.1)16 (8.8)15 (9.3)4 (7.1)
Reoperation20 (6.7)19 (8.7)17 (9.4)16 (9.9)6 (10.7)
Recurrence but no reoperation7 (2.4)7 (3.2)6 (3.3)6 (3.7)3 (5.4)